Union Leader Logo

Site Search

Court douses plan to burn building

Share on Facebook

Reader comments

By JASON SCHREIBER
Union Leader Correspondent

A judge has doused a plan to burn down a 19th century building on the grounds of the former Sanborn Regional High School.

Rockingham County Superior Court Judge Tina Nadeau granted a last-minute restraining order Friday, halting Saturday's plans to set Gilmore Cottage ablaze as part of a regional training exercise for firefighters.

The order came after neighbor Stanley Shalett took legal action late last week to save the wood-frame building in the town's historic district.

"No amount of money can ever replace the original structure ... or make it whole again. Dating back to the 1850s, this building is of historical value to the Kingston Historic District and to the people of Kingston and should be spared of its destruction by any and all means the court wishes to indicate," Shalett wrote in his petition for the temporary restraining order.

But the 11th-hour legal challenge to stop the burn irked school board Chairman Kurt Baitz, whose board doesn't want to spend tax dollars to maintain the deteriorating building.

"The building serves no purpose to the school district and has no historical significance," he said.

A hearing on the matter is scheduled for Dec. 23 in Rockingham County Superior Court.

Gilmore Cottage, 178 Main St., was once a superintendent's office. It has sat empty for years. It sits on the grounds of the old high school that was originally known as Sanborn Seminary. The nearby seminary building is one of four buildings in town listed on the National Register of Historic Places.

Baitz argues that the effort to stop the burn is tied to the Historic District Commission's battle to keep a Hannaford supermarket from building within the historic district. The store has been approved, but the plan remains tied up in court. The commission and some neighbors have argued for years that the store has no place in the district.

Baitz said the historic commission simply wants to get more buildings on the national registry to "better suit the people who are anti-Hannaford."

"Somewhere, it's not about preserving the building. It's about politics," Baitz said.

The order also frustrated Fire Chief Bill Seaman, who found out the training was halted late Friday afternoon.

Firefighters participating in the training with their apparatus were expected to come from not only Kingston but also Brentwood, Danville, East Kingston, Exeter, Fremont, Newton and Plaistow.

"The timing was very unfortunate. We had so much time invested in this thing," Seaman said.

The school district spent about $5,000 to remove asbestos from the building as it prepared for the training.

Seaman said Unitil donated time Friday to drop high power wires on the property, but had to return yesterday to put them back up.

Others had donated food for the training, and vendors were lined up to demonstrate fire equipment.

The school board began exploring options for using its old high school campus when a new high school opened in 2006.

The board decided to use some of the buildings for educational purposes, but agreed that two of the old wooden structures on the campus -- Gilmore Cottage and Colcord Hall -- should be removed.

The board told the Historic District Commission months ago about the plan to get rid of the building.

But with the backing of several preservation groups, the commission voted unanimously in August to oppose the demolition plan.

YOUR COMMENTS


I strongly feel that what I did was the right thing to do, and that's to get an injunction against those whose wish to to destroy the Kingston Historic District by making it go up in smoke and flames.
- Stanley Shalett, Kingston, NH 03848

here are people who would tear down all beautiful old buildings and make every street in the country look like Route 9 in Framingham, Mass.

A great ruling by Judge Nadeau.
- Bill Howard, Exeter

Not every old building is beautiful OR SAFE. For those who want this building to stay perhaps you should donate your time and money to maintain it.
- Kitt, Exeter

That's good info. Thanks for posting Alton.
- Joan, Concord

I know what building this is and it is NOT historic. It is an eye-sore, and I feel the training the departments would get from the burn would benefit the town and is more valuable than the building remaining there.
- Nate, Merrimack

I'm all for saving buildings of significance...but not just any old random building.

If a private person or company wants to maintain it, great. Otherwise, let it go.

And Clarence, I don't know if you've ever been to the south, but I have and they tear down anything older than 1980.
- Dennis, Manchester, NH

I am against Judge Tina Nadeau's ruling. As an explorer on the Kingston Fire Department, I have put alot of effort into preparing the building for the burn. I must say that the building might originally have been built in the 1850's, but has been repaired so many times that only the foundation is original. Also, the building is a hazardous problem because it is starting to lean. The timbers, which are 2x4's, are both not original and are rotted. The school system has contracted the company Habitatas for Humanity to salvage anything that could be reused. They took most of the aluminum storm windows and most of the wiring. The building itself has almost no historical value because it was most likely rebuilt in the 1960's. It is also in too much disrepair to be used. The school gave permission to the fire department so that they could use it for training. I know its sad, but all building will be eventually demolished. It's a part of life. When the fire department burns a building for training, it provides valuable training experience for inexperienced firefighters.
- Alton Veroneau, Kingston

I find it funny, that everyone who thinks we should "save" this building, isn't even from the town of Kingston. Have any of you even seen Gilmore cottage? or read the article? The building is NOT a historical building, contrary, it is an eye sore, and it is only going to get worse. It has been gutted on the inside, there is nothing of "value" historically or otherwise associated with the building. As a tax payer, who actually lives in this town, I for one am not happy to have an eye sore that I get to pay for! Yes, this IS the historical district, but this is NOT a historical building. Also, this building has nothing to do with Hannaford, this is not the location Hannaford was looking at. Please check your facts. Also, my thanks to the local fire departments for all your work preparing for the day, only to have the rug pulled out from under you.
- Traci, Kingston, NH

Speaking of historic homes, does anyone know what the plans are for the old Federalist style home on the corner of rt 111 and Hardwood Rd in Windham (across from the elementary school)? The home was once beautifully maintained and landscaped but has lately fallen into disrepair and all the surrounding trees have been cut down. Is someone planning on demolishing that one too? The place has to be almost 200 years old. It would be a shame for the town to lose such a wonderful piece of its history.
- William, Hudson

A sense of place is the only thing that distinguishes one community from another. Did we learn nothing from the the 1960's urban renewal debacle? If we continue to get rid of our historic buildings, we destroy our past and our links to it. Shame on the School Board, who should be educating our children about such things instead of destroying them.
- Sue Hunt, Alexandria

We should be preserving all that we can of our nation's history... not setting a match to it because it's a bother to take care of. I wonder if these people also abandon their own parents once they become old and in need of care. Great ruling and hopefully it stands... I might not live in this town but Hannaford's has no place in a Historic District. Move the eye sore elsewhere and allow the uniqueness of the past stand.
- Rose, Manchester

These "do gooders" like Mr Shalett have every right to save these buildings. However, they do not have the right to reach into my wallet to pay for it. You want to preserve the building, you pay for it!
- Mike Bodruk, manchester

As a homeowner it is not my responsibility, duty or mission to educate the public about how any any class of people lived. This issue is about private property. I live in an old house and I am preserving it because I appreciate the historic value of it and others like it, however I have no claim on anyone else's property. I like old houses but I like the personal liberties and freedoms provided by our constitution much more. My suggestion is that if an individual needs to have a structure saved he should buy it himself and then he can do whatever he wishes (within the law of course).
On another note, that the fire departments will receive from this controlled burn will be invaluable. It will help these agencies to save lives, which are truly irreplaceable.
- Bob, Deerfield

There are people who would tear down all beautiful old buildings and make every street in the country look like Route 9 in Framingham, Mass.

A great ruling by Judge Nadeau.
- Bill Howard, Exeter

Preservationism is not about preservation; it's about giving gadflies like Mr. Shalett control over property owners that they don't deserve. Of course that specific building could not be reassembled from the ashes. But if someone wanted such a building, despite its complete lack of historical significance, it would be easy to rebuild it. The assertion that the original building must be preserved rather than rebuilt implies that it's somehow sacred. Environmentalism likewise is not about actual impact on humans but on declaring certain resources sacred--again, for the empowerment of gadflies.
- Spike, Brentwood NH

The New England mentality towards structures is certainly different from that of the south and west a building as old as this structure is classic farmhouse type structure and is worthy of preservation. Not every historic structure is a Mount Vernon or grand mansion like the Breakers or Biltmore house. At the alarming rate we are destroying small early cape cods and structures like this a person will never know how real working class families lived.
- clarance, northwood

At the very least, the wood can be salvaged and used in other construction. It's hard to find timber of that quality anymore.
- Kim, Chester

NOTE: If you have visited this page before, newer comments may be hidden. Press F5, or hold down the Ctrl key while reloading or refreshing the page. (Another option for Firefox users is the Clear Cache add-on.)