No guarantees: Eagle Times subsidy is wrong
New Hampshire faces a budget problem so severe that the state laid off more than 300 employees, including the entire staff of a mandatory rehabilitation program for repeat drunk drivers, and still a major shortfall looms. Revenues are $38 million below projections so far this fiscal year. All told, the state might be in the hole by more than half a billion dollars. And yet Gov. John Lynch and the Executive Council thought it fitting for the state to guarantee a line of credit to two private businesses.
One is the Eagle Times, the Claremont newspaper that folded earlier this year only to be reborn under a new publisher. The council agreed -- unanimously -- to have the state guarantee 75 percent of a $250,000 line of credit to the publisher. That's $181,500 for which taxpayers are on the hook if the paper goes out of business again.
This is an outrageous risk of taxpayer money.

You will get no argument from us about newspapers' value to a republic. But the civic services journalists perform are beside the point. A newspaper is a private enterprise. The state's duty is to spend taxpayer money on legitimate public services that only the state can provide. Bankrolling a business -- any business -- is not one of those functions.
This loan guarantee is far from the state's first. The Business Finance Authority obtains state guarantees for private business loans all the time. This is an obvious misuse of taxpayer-backed credit.
Any public benefit that accrues from the success of a private business will be tangential to the benefit that accrues to the owner. One could argue that there is no public benefit at all in the case of the Eagle Times because when the paper closed, several others, including this one, stepped in to take its place. The state is doing nothing more than subsidizing one among many competing businesses.
Try as the governor and council might, there is no justification for this subsidy. It is an unnecessary squandering of state assets. Economic development? That's a rationalization, not a reason. With that excuse, the state could directly finance every business in the state.
The taxpayers should demand and end to these taxpayer-backed loans. No business should be able to tap the people's collective credit for its own private gain.
So it turns out that U.S. Senate candidate Kelly Ayotte's pro-life "win'' before the U.S. Supreme Court actually cost the taxpayers of New Hampshire a whopping $300,000, payable to the "losing'' pro-abortion Planned Parenthood.
.jpg)
While both Rich Ashooh and Sean Mahoney have impressed us with their ideas and business backgrounds, we think Ashooh makes the better, more thoughtful case on the issues.
More Editorials >>>
- > It's Ovide: There is no better choice (28)
- > Downing for sheriff: The pick for Rockingham County
- > Shovel ready: A $50 billion gov't bank (20)
- > Editorial Cartoon: Hope there isn't a sequel
- > Orwellian 'ethics': Pelham needs a lesson (10)
- > Editorial Cartoon: The Mantra (14)
- > Editorial Cartoon: Then and Now (11)
- > Editorial Cartoon: Hold the sprinkles, please (4)
- > Binnie's whopper: When caught, he lies more (18)
- > ICE warm: Going soft on immigration (13)
- > Adams for council: A great choice in District 2
- > Editorial Cartoon: That Victory Thingy (1)
- > Editorial Cartoon: Oval Office (2)
- > Just crazy: The Discovery shooter (8)
- > Editorial Cartoon: New model (1)

.jpg)

Print
Email
Mobile
Reader comments
Andrew Cline has been editorial page editor of the New Hampshire Union Leader since October of 2001. His writing has appeared in more than 100 newspapers and magazines, including The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, and National Review.
YOUR COMMENTS
- Mae, Plaistow
Salmon press gave it a go with the Claremont villager and probably would have made it if the Eagle didnt rear its ugly head again. For companies to be able to use the bankruptcy process and govt. backed loans to strike down well run companies trying to make it on their own is just so wrong. I hope this attempt at re-starting the Eagle fails and let the state hold the bag this time.
- John, Manchester
The truth being that the state backs lines of credit for all kinds of businesses. The fact that the multiple owners of the Eagle Times would have to go bankrupt before the state would be on the hook for a cent (George Sample is reportedly worth more than 100 million himself, do you think he's going to go bankrupt for the $250,000 line of credit?).
And then the inconvenient truth that the Valley News, which first reported this story, neglected to note that it's parent company had sought government backed funding itself.
But that wouldn't sell as many newspapers would it.
- James, New London
- clarence, northwood
He lays off 300 State workers, but pulls this stunt. He's as much of a dissapointment as our new "President" They are both stellar losers, putting us, the American people at risk, more and more every day.
- Mike, Nashua, NH
- Jim, Manchester
You commented on David T post. He mentioned the arena.
Did the Union Leader complain about taxpayers money being used to fund Verizon Wireless Arena?
Did the Union Leader have editorials that said Verizon Wireless Arena should only be built with private funds?
Did the Union Leader complain about using rooms and meals tax revenues to pay for Verizon Wireless Arena?
Manchester is spending more than 4 million dollars a year on Verizon Wireless Arena.
Has the Union Leader asked the management of Verizon Wireless Arena to place a ticket surcharge on tickets? Before voters got to vote on Verizon Wireless Arena, I believe that they were promised that there was going to be a ticket surcharge on tickets.
- Ken Stremsky, Manchester, NH
As a former newspaper owner, I fought this battle when various proposals would be advanced to allow newspapers, usually small weeklies, to be allowed to get SBA loans. While that infusion of some working capital would help to smooth out the often seasonal cash flow that arrived for newspapers working in tourist areas, it opened the door for something worse – government meddling in the process of a free press.
I have no doubt whatsoever that this loan will deter the Eagle Times from commenting on any activity of the Governor or Council, but it is not a good precedent and hopefully this is the last newspaper bailout.
Ted Leach
Hancock, NH
- Ted Leach, Hancock
sarcasm intended
- Michael Layon, Derry
- Dave, Manchester
People move there because its cheap to live in the area. That is because there are no jobs to any significant extent.
Then they expect others in the state to subsidize them. The newspaper thing is in the same arena.
- Bob, Salem
- James F. Maloney, Bedford NH
- Harry, Atkinson
- Michael King, Epping
- George, Concord
- Joe Conway, Charlestown, NH
- Mark Ridel, Manchester, NH
I'd say don't ever buy the paper again, but then, yikes...we'll still have to pay for it! This is completely unacceptable Governor and Executive Council, but then you haven't cared about we the people in a very, very long time.
Show up to vote next time and vote all of these gov't clowns out of office who want to control more and more of our lives...puleze~!!
- judy, bradford
- Don Armstrong, Henniker
- mike, cornish
- Bill, Deerfield
This type of subsidy not only unnecessarily risks taxpayer money by investing in an industry with a very risky future, but it puts pressure on the competent Newspaper businesses that have been able to survive in spite of the current digital market challenges.
I'm one of the people who fuss as much as not on these UL pages about the UL. But the UL is one of the papers who are doing a darn good job at surviving as a public service.
Government should not be putting them under any more - economically artificial - pressure, the private economy is throwing plenty their way.
The UL might want to consider trying to harnessing the energy and resources of the entrepreneurs giving the Eagle Times a try. Newspapers - all newspapers - need all the help and partnerships they can get in the long term.
Complaining about government is one thing. But providing leadership and innovation in the private sector Newspaper economy is something the UL might want to constantly reevaluate. There seems like opportunities here. You guys are real competent over there in business. Think outside the box on this issue.
Of course newspapers compete among themselves. But that competition dwarfs the competition between all newspapers and the other mediums.
You guys are seizing the opportunity to complain about this issue. Don't miss the other opportunities while doing so.
- Bob Jean, Northwood, NH 03261
It would seem that while we are trying to stress job creation - and holding onto jobs - it should be focused on New Hampshire companies, so that the corporate profits tax stays in the state. If part of the deal was a state loan guarantee, shouldn't the bankruptcy procedures have guaranteed that the newspaper would be bought by a state company, entity or individual?
Those folks working for the Eagle Times also have a role in assisting the creation of and preserving jobs around the plant - including cafes, stores, gas, etc. - purchased in Claremont. So, there is some trickle down (unless the employees hired back work in Vermont).
I also wonder what kind of access regular individuals have to this information or programs like these. I'm not rich by any means, but if I knew that the state had a loan guarantee program like this, I surely would have looked into finding out about saving the Eagle Times. I’m sure I could have come up with the rest of the money. Back in 2008, I also looked into buying the Argus Champion from the former owner of the Eagle Times decided to let the weekly close instead of allowing someone to try and keep it alive.
So, I'm mixed about this.
- Tony Schinella, Concord, NH
- Patty Meserve, Dover
By all accounts this new out of state entity has deep pockets and prints newspapers in other parts of the country already plus they recieved all the local government, school and county taxpayer funded advertising amounting to tens of thousands of taxpayers dollars yearly.
Does this mean that I am supporting my competition and backing their loan because I pay taxes in my state?
It is good to have the government support new businesses and get people back to work but now you are placing a taxpayer backed advantage to some in an open market.
Is this the new and improved New Hampshire advantage??
I am a small newspaper that began before the Eagle left and have weathered all the corporations that saw Claremont as a new market and have even seen some already close in a very short time, yet I'm still here with no state sponsored assistance even from the unemployment office. I contacted a local unemployment office hoping to hire a salesperson or two and I was basically told to go on line and fill out forms to try to match someone with the job you are offering. I thought that there would be a data base available to match businesses with people looking for work. Not the case. I have had better results using Craigslist.
Just my two cents worth.
Thank you to everyone who has called offering their support.
claremontcitypost@comcast.net
Chris Shaban
Owner
Claremont City Post
- Claremont City Post, Claremont
- Spike, Brentwood NH
bnyoung@metrocast.net
- Niel Young, Laconia
Suppose the paper needs to write something critical of Gov. Lynch, can imagine of the internal debate about biting the hand that feeds you?
This is partly my money! I'm baffled, I thought this was America.
- Greg Salts, Manchester
- Jacqueline Hamilton, Goffstown NH
*** Editor's note: The Union Leader has regularly criticized this sort of city use of taxpayer dollars. Recent examples include last week's editorial on the Hackett Hill development project and a September editorial arguing that Walmart, not the city, should pay for any road improvements necessitated by a new store. ***
- David T, Alton
- Stephen, Sullivan
- Kevin, Lancaster
Thomas Paine wouldn't recognize this America.
- Don, Meredith
- Craig, Manchester
NOTE: If you have visited this page before, newer comments may be hidden. Press F5, or hold down the Ctrl key while reloading or refreshing the page. (Another option for Firefox users is the Clear Cache add-on.)