Canada's deficits were worse than ours in the 1990s. Then the Liberal Party government decided to make tough decisions.
Rep. Paul Hodes' column in the Nov. 29 New Hampshire Sunday News is the best example yet of how Washington is broken.
More Columns >>>
- > Kathy Sullivan: Gatsas' school plan is entirely unworkable (22)
- > Frederick Kagan and Kimberly Kagan: Pursue legitimacy in Afghanistan (4)
- > Joe McQuaid: Soldiering on despite surgery, I mull handicapped-parking, TV drug ads (6)
- > The long arm of law reaches into history (6)
- > Paul Hodes: Put people over profits (63)
- > Taking the long look in Hopkinton (8)
- > Fergus Cullen: The unconservative economics of Christmas (5)
- > Anthony Faiola: In Germany, the high price of going green (6)
- > Jeb Bradley: Shea-Porter supports a disastrous health care 'reform' plan (37)
- > New for the holidays: Scroogenomics (14)
- > Judd Gregg: The Democrats are steering us back toward Europe (62)
- > Charles M. Arlinghaus: Small changes can make health insurance much better (2)
- > College students stymied by fractions (22)
- > Joe McQuaid: Thankfully, I'm sidelined from the family's annual pie-baking marathon (3)
- > Many chose Millyard canals as watery grave (7)
Pat Buchanan: What's good for GM is good for the GOP
Understandably, Republicans are seething.
When Hank Paulson demanded $700 billion to haul away the trash in the Dumpsters of JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs -- assuring us we could hold a garage sale of the junk -- they rebelled. They acted as the nation, by 100-1, demanded. They killed the Wall Street bailout.
The Dow quickly sank another 1,000 points, and charged with criminal irresponsibility by the elites, the GOP buckled, reversed itself, rescued the bailout -- and was wiped out on Nov. 4.
Now we hear from Paulson that the $700 billion Congress voted will not, after all, be used to buy up all that rotten paper on the books of the big banks. Some banks are using the cash to buy other banks.
So Republicans are right to be enraged. They are victims of the biggest bait-and-switch in political history. But they are now about to do something terminally stupid. With GM, Ford and Chrysler teetering on the brink, they are turning a cold stone face to Detroit and are about to follow the counsel of that quintessential Bushite Dick Darman, who said of our computer chip industry, "If our guys can't hack it, let 'em go."
America responded -- by letting George H.W. Bush and Darman go.
Are Republicans aware of what they are about to do?
When workers, execs, engineers, dealers, salesmen and suppliers are all factored in, the Big Three employ 3 million people who contribute $21 billion a year to Social Security and Medicare, and $25 billion in federal income taxes. Add in all the businesses that depend on the auto industry, and we are talking about one-tenth of the U.S. labor force.
As columnist Tom Piatak of Chronicles and Takimag.com writes, 850,000 retirees, and their families, depend on pensions and health care from the Big Three. If they go under, the burden falls on us.
And to let the auto industry die is to write America out of much of the economic future of the planet.
In a good year, like 2005, Americans buy more than 17 million new cars, and West Europeans as many. Tens of millions in Eastern Europe, Russia, China, India and Southeast Asia are now moving into the middle class each year. These folks will all need or want one or two family cars. If we let the U.S. auto industry die, that immense and burgeoning market will be lost forever to America, and ceded to Asia.
"Who cares?" comes the free-traders' reply. Japanese and Koreans are setting up factories here. They can pick up the slack.
But that means Americans will work for and depend on foreign companies for a necessity of our national life as vital as the imported oil and gas on which our cars and trucks operate. All the profits of the mighty automobile industry in America will be sent abroad.
Before Republicans follow this free-trade fanaticism to their final interment, they might study the results of a poll by Peter Hart:
-- Seventy-eight percent of Americans believe the U.S. auto industry is highly or extremely important. Three percent think we can do without it.
-- Ninety percent of Americans believe the death of the U.S. auto industry would do great damage to our economic future.
-- By 55 percent to 30 percent, Americans favor federal loans to save it. And by 64 percent to 25 percent Americans back President-elect Obama's resolve not to let the U.S. auto industry go under.
If the GOP blocks these loans, and the industry dies, the party can forget about Ohio, Michigan and the industrial Midwest. For the Reagan Democrats will never come home again. Nor should they.
By the choices we make, we define ourselves and reveal what we truly care about. Thus, consider:
We bail out the New York and D.C. governments of Abe Beame and Marion Barry. We bail out a corrupt Mexico. We bail out public schools that have failed us for 40 years.
We bail out with International Monetary Fund and World Bank loans and foreign aid worthless Third World regimes.
We bail out Wall Street plutocrats and big banks.
But the most magnificent industry, the auto industry that was the pride of America and envy of the world, we surrender to predator-traders from Asia and Europe, lest we violate the tenets of some 19th-century ideological scribblers that the old Republicans considered the apogee of British stupidity.
Nancy Pelosi is talking about tying loans to a restructuring of the industry. But Congress is not competent to do that.
What needs to be restructured is the U.S. tax-and-trade regime.
Dump globalism. Instruct Japan, Canada, Korea, Germany and China that if they wish to sell cars here, they will assemble them here and produce the parts here. And we shall have the same free access to and same share of their auto market as they have of ours.
To accomplish this, use the same import quotas and tariffs Ronald Reagan used to save the steel industry and Harley-Davidson.
Reciprocal trade. Even Democrats like FDR used to practice it.
Pat Buchanan is a former Republican and Reform Party candidate for President, adviser to two Presidents and a syndicated columnist based in Washington, D.C.

.jpg)




Andrew Cline has been editorial page editor of the New Hampshire Union Leader since October of 2001. His writing has appeared in more than 100 newspapers and magazines, including The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, and National Review.
Print
Email
Mobile
Reader comments
YOUR COMMENTS
"…By the choices we make, we define ourselves and reveal what we truly care about…"
Amen. We have before us a perfect opportunity to direct Detroit and consumers toward renewable fuels, and at the same time we solve three bugaboos with one $25 billion bailout.
1. We reestablish the America as the world leader in automotive engineering and manufacturing. Who will be buying gas guzzlers from Asia when they can have US-built efficient green alternatives.
2. We eliminate the hold the Middle East has over us. Without oil, does anyone really care what becomes of that cat box known as the Middle East?
3. We pass on a cleaner environment to our children.
Of course, we also save the undeserving hides of a lot of companies that underwrote the CDS market, but then we've already invested $180 billion I AIG. Either way, we'll be spending more on them. By investing in the automotive industry, the benefits accrue to someone off Wall Street for a change.
- David, Alton
Do we (Congress) have any leeway as far as managing or restricting the expenditures on the $750 billion Paulson has? Who is getting all this cash? Could part of that go to help the auto industry in loan guarantees?
This would be a good investigative story for an enterprising journalist on the UL.
It should also be pointed out that if there are this many questions about the first go around, how on earth does anyone expect Pelosi to monitor any restructuring of an entire industry?
- William Simpson, Concord
So Pat, does that mean GM should also have their parts made in the US too...or did you not realize that the majority of parts used by GM are made in Canada? And bankruptcy doesn't mean GM and Ford are disappearing, Delta and America Airlines filed chapter 11 several years ago, but they are still around. If anything chapter 11 is a good thing for these companies, they need to reorganized their businesses and rewrite the union contracts. There is something wrong when the cost per employee to GM is $80/hour while Toyota is $40/hour! For 20 years people have been telling the big 3 to get their books in order...they didn't! So I wonder if the big three will be flying back to Washington this week in their private jets again???
- Mike, Manchester
But Pat, don't you know that the plan is to pack away as many Trillions as they can and then file bankruptcy.
That's why they don't tell us where the money went. They are laundering it into post bankruptcy. That's why they will go against our will as citizens and throw trillions around like it's ticker tape. Get a clue!
- Rich, Manchester, NH.
NOTE: If you have visited this page before, newer comments may be hidden. Press F5, or hold down the Ctrl key while reloading or refreshing the page. (Another option for Firefox users is the Clear Cache add-on.)