Site Search
While slot machines remain the focus of expanding gambling legislation, the middle of the gambling floor of a rebuilt Rockingham Park would be earmarked for table games such as roulette, Black Jack and poker, the developer said last night.
Shhh, they're talking income tax
By TOM FAHEY
State House Bureau Chief
Sunday, Sep. 6, 2009
OOPS. Speaker of the House Terie Norelli let a little secret slip last week.
She mentioned a legislative economic summit that's still in the planning stages when she met with the Portsmouth Herald's editorial board.
Rep. Susan Almy, heading up the summit work, said she was trying to keep quiet her plans for the joint House-Senate summit this fall.
When the Herald mentioned that all forms of revenue, including an income tax, would be part of the discussion, alarms went off all over the conservative landscape. Almy said she expected that reaction, which is why she was working behind the scenes up until now.
Norelli told us everything will be on the table, but she did not say she favors an income tax. In fact, she figures that with Gov. John Lynch promising a veto, it's obvious there won't be one.
Norelli said the best time to look at the revenue landscape is when lawmakers don't have a budget gun pointed at their heads.
"It's an opportunity for us to take a look at all our taxes and fees. Do they help or hurt the economy, or are they neutral? What's good for economic development and what's bad? They will be hearing from economists on a national and state level on the right and on the left and, hopefully, in between, and there won't be any recommendation coming out of it. It's strictly giving people information," Norelli said.
Almy, D-Lebanon, said she has talked about the session with members of her Ways and Means Committee, which she chairs, and with Sen. Bob Odell, R-Lempster, who chairs Senate Way and Means.
"So far we've had nothing but considerable interest from all sides of spectrum in wanting to talk about this," Almy said.
"I'm trying to keep this from being political. We need to understand our system better to know what we're doing."
The House held onto an income tax bill last year for more study. Some Ways and Means members wanted a forum on the income tax, but Almy said she thinks the discussion should be more wide ranging.
The state hasn't made a major reform in its tax code in nearly 20 years, she said, and "a lot of things have changed during that time."
She wants a variety of people to come before the committee, including columnists, think-tank executives, business owners and others who have experience with the current tax system and opinions on how it should change.
Aside from the big summit, Almy plans some shorter sessions on other issues. They start Thursday when her committee hears from UNH professor Ross Gittell on the effects an income tax could have on businesses.
TAX OPPONENTS READY: New Hampshire Advantage Coalition executive director Matt Murphy was among the conservatives criticizing Norelli over the income tax idea.
"It's the height of hypocrisy for legislators to decry the current economic situation while contemplating ways to increase taxes, at a time when New Hampshire families and businesses are trimming expenses and decreasing spending to meet their declining revenue," Murphy said.
NHAC and nearly a dozen other tax fighting groups drew 500 people to a $10-a-head pork roast at the Rochester Fair grounds last weekend.
The unexpectedly high turnout forced organizers to send out for more food, NHAC president Roger Wilkins said.
'TENT TAX' TARGETED: At least one Republican hasn't forgotten New Hampshire's newest tax sensation -- the "tent tax."
The budget that passed in June not only bumped up the Rooms and Meals tax rate from 8 percent to 9 percent, it extended the tax to include campsite rentals.
Rep. David Boutin of Hooksett said he will file a bill to repeal the camping tax. "I suspect there may be one in the Senate, too," he said.
"Call it a tent tax, a wilderness tax, whatever. The real issue is the damage it's done to campgrounds. Coming to New Hampshire is what we're all about. Streams, forests, rivers, the outdoors," Boutin said. "To charge someone to sleep in a bag on the ground next to a cooler is outrageous."
LAYOFFS LOOM: More layoffs are more likely, now that talks with the State Employees Association have stalled.
The new budget called for 200 layoffs among the state's 10,000 workers. Gov. Lynch, looking for $25 million in personnel savings the budget calls for, hoped to get a system of furloughs in place quickly in a new SEA contract. Without furloughs, Lynch said 750 workers would have to be laid off.
Final details of a written contract were being nailed down until last week. Then SEA president Gary Smith broke off talks over pay for corrections workers, who lost guaranteed overtime they used to get for showing up at a daily briefing. SEA said the tentative deal reached in mid-July covered the issue. The governor's office disagreed.
SEA had proposed specific furlough dates for all state workers, which gave its members five four-day weekends in the next year and half. No telling where that plan will go now.
An entire fiscal quarter will go by before SEA members approve a contract, or a take single furlough day. That puts the squeeze on Lynch to find savings elsewhere. The longer he waits, the more extreme the action must be.
Informal talks have continued, to try to keep things from going completely off track.
2010 ELECTION SEASON LOOKING HOT: From the looks of U.S. Rep. Paul Hodes' press conference last week, the 2010 election season is going to be an intense affair. The topic was domestic violence, but Hodes drew a big crowd to what would normally be a relatively sleepy summer event.
Among the observers were seven people wielding small video cameras. It took less than 24 hours for video to start showing up on blog sites, complete with commentary.
State Republican Party spokesman Ryan Williams handed out bags of Flat Earth baked veggie chips before Hodes began speaking. He criticized Hodes' comments likening health-care reform opponents to the Flat Earth Society.
"What they care about is health scare, not health care," Hodes told a pro-reform crowd in Portsmouth.
The GOP made hay from the comment, saying that appears to put Medicare clients who fear cuts in coverage in the flat-earth camp.
As for the chips, Williams said, "As a flat-earther, I'm a proud eater of Flat Earth chips. I eat them all the time."
Hodes has taken heat for not holding an open town-hall-style meeting on health-care reform. He responds that he has talked in "a variety of forums" on the topic.
DEMS ORGANIZING: Democrats are still working on a site for the annual Jefferson-Jackson dinner the party will hold in October. It's the biggest fundraiser of the year, party executive director Mike Brunelle said.
But the emphasis this fall will be on organizing. He said the party plans two dozen training events this fall to get activists ready for the coming election season.
This week, the party is hosting up to 40 house parties where dedicated Dems will watch President Obama address the nation on health-care reform. Those at the parties will be asked to write letters to editors of their local papers emphasizing the need for reform, Brunelle said.
The Democratic National Committee's offshoot Organizing for America delivered 10,000 petitions to U.S. Sen. Judd Gregg's Concord office Friday calling on him to support health care reforms.
Rep. Cindy Rosenwald, D-Nashua, was with the group, noting that 11 percent of New Hampshire citizens have no health insurance.
JUDICIAL NOMINATION HEARINGS: The Executive Council meets this week in Jaffrey, but plans to wait until it's back home in Concord to hold public hearings on Lynch's nominations to the Superior Court.
A marathon five-hour session will begin at 3 p.m. on Sept. 23 for hearings on four judges and one marital master. Each candidate gets one hour, starting with Jacalyn A. Colburn, then David A. Garfunkel, Richard B. McNamara and Marguerite L. Wageling. Lynn E. Abby of Portsmouth, nominated as a marital master, goes last.
MORE STIMULUS MONEY: The state's efforts to fight hospital-acquired infections got a boost form the federal government last week.
The Department of Health and Human Services announced it received a $757,000 grant in federal stimulus money to help state hospitals prevent the infections.
The state passed a law in 2006 that requires hospitals to report infections and prevention measures to HHS. Nationally, hospital-acquired infections are associated with 99,000 deaths a year.
Tom Fahey is State House bureau chief of the New Hampshire Union Leader and Sunday News.

.jpg)


Print
Email
Mobile
Reader comments
YOUR COMMENTS
New Hampshire's current system is very close to the economic ideal supported by such notables as Jefferson, Churchill, Locke, Voltaire, Tolstoy, Lincoln, Twain, Henry Ford, and Einstein. The only change New Hampshire should make to its tax structure is to exclude buildings by shifting the tax entirely onto land values.
- Unlike income taxes, land value taxes don't punish wealth creation because land isn't created and is in fixed supply.
- Unlike income taxes, privacy doesn't have to be invaded because land assessment is relatively public and easy to determine.
- Unlike income taxes, evasion and avoidance are difficult because land cannot flee or be hidden like labor or capital.
- Unlike income taxes, land value taxes are easy to comply with and don't require small businesses to hire experts on tax code.
- Unlike income taxes, everyone pays their fair share, because there is no way to avoid it. Every advantage that a specific piece of land confers on its owners is reflected in its market value.
- Unlike income taxes, land value tracks well with the quality of services provided in the town.
- Unlike income taxes, the money from land value taxes tends to stay local and within control of the residents.
- Land value taxes end up being good for the environment by favoring urban compaction and efficient use of land. While urban and suburban areas may end up being more built up, total pristine acreage is increased. Infrastructure costs are reduced as sprawl is counteracted.
Look at what happened to surrounding states and municipalities when they started taxing things that could flee, people and businesses left! New Hampshire has a great advantage in that it is the only state with no general sales or income taxes. We should be moving closer to the tax with the least negative economic impact, not further away from it.
There are only a few disadvantages with land value tax, which can be overcome relatively easily. The first is that property taxes in general are very visible and easy to get angry about. I actually consider this a good thing, because it engages people in the political process. When income taxes are hidden by withholding, people are less vigilant against government overspending. The second is that income and sales taxes affect liquid money, not wealth in general. It is much more painful to sell a house to discharge a tax liability than to forego an economic transaction. This can be solved by applying tax liens for land sales in the case temporary or permanent hardship.
On a final note, since tax liabilities are capitalized into the sale price of land, less land tax equals higher purchase price. Why pay extra money to a bank (with interest) only to have them get a bailout when they become overextended? That money is better spent locally on infrastructure.
- Justin Keith, Rochester
Republicans had an opportunity to live up to the fiscal responsibility plank in the republican platform, they blew it. This is why many republicans backed away from republican politicians in 2006 and 2008 and hoped that the democrats would honor their newly acquired promises to be fiscal responsible. Now we are seeing that the democrats are not keeping their promises either.
Hopefully politicians of both parties will learn in 2010 that the American people have had it with their irresponsibility and many incumbents will be replaced with people who hopefully will keep their promises, or they will be replaced as well.
To keep taxes low, we must keep spending low. Our focus must be to keep spending low as well as keeping taxes low.
- Don, Meredith
Why is NH surprised that an income tax may be implemented. NH elected Democrats. Democrats Raise Taxes. No one should be surprised by any of this.
- David, Raymond
An income tax will not get rid property taxes. It just increases their caufers which they will feel mandated to spend for you. Taxes increase when times are good and money is coming in and must be increased when times are bad, because the people need it.
- John, hooksett
I knew state income tax would arise sooner or later with Jeanne Shaheen as senator.This will be followed by a sales tax.Go back to mass Gov Lynch where you came from.This is a Live free or Die state and were tired of big govt trying to enslave us by TAX
- tina maggio, derry
Peter, Canterbury, What would you like to call the the group of political appointees (hacks) with no medical background that will decide if Grandpa gets the pacemaker or "a pain pill" to quote your messiah? Because that is what your saviour has said he wants to do.
- Allan, Rochester
Mr Elliot- you have somehow left out the mess that Clinton left us with. The list is long but one thing he said was that bin laden was no threat and look what happened.
The dems and reps are equally responsible for this mess.
Finger pointing is not working.
The PEOPLE need to send a message to government- that unless you make government smaller and find ways to spend our money more carefully, then they will be in the unemployment line the next election.
But that then would make too much sense and people are too busy that their guy is better, and that anybody that disagrees is a racist and this person listens to talk radio too much- it's disgusting!
These people in office are human- they are NOT gods. Stop worshipping them as such and MAKE THEM DO THE JOBS WE PAY THEM FOR!
Why do people accept so much less from the government but so much from their own employees???
Kudos to Adam for re-enlightening the people of NH to another politicians lies.
- Donna, Rye
If Republicans want to not be compared to Flat-Earthers, then it would behoove them to stop making easily-disproved statements that rely on the listeners taking them on faith. When major GOP leaders are openly lying about the health care debate and making up 'death panels' out of a counseling option proposed by Republican Senator Jonny Isakson of Georgia, they shouldn't be surprised when people start describing them as liars and lunatics.
- Peter, Canterbury
Hey Terie Norelli, in the real world of working individuals we call slips like this CLM's (aka - career limiting move). The faster we get you out of office, the faster the change to fiscal responsibility can be implemented.
- Randall, Manchester
NH should look to Connecticut as a case study on the impact of an income tax. For two hundred years CT balanced its budget without an income tax. In 1991 they instituted one. Since then they've had a net loss of jobs and they still can't balance the budget. Why, because per capita spending has doubled since the income tax was instituted. Go figure.
- Chris L, Manchester
Many were warning 3 years ago that if the Democrats continued raising spending by 17-20% every year, there would be an income tax (duh). The Democrats insisted that that was just "scare tactics." Well, looky, looky. The Democrats ARE going to give us an income tax.
Unless we vote them out in 2010, which I think is exactly what we're going to do.
- Jack, Concord
I am of the opinion that the Democrats in the State Legislature deliberately forecasted overly optimistic revenue projections in order to create a revenue shortfall, and then use that as the basis for bringing income tax to the table for discussion.
In other words, they created the situation needed for discussing an income tax - on purpose.
- David R, Manchester
This isn't going to happen. An income tax simply doesn't have the support of enough Democrats to get a majority vote in the House and Senate. And even in the unlikely that they did pass an income tax, Lynch would probably veto it.
- Tom, Keene, NH
Take a look at your paycheck and see how much is being taken out for taxes already. I'm self-employeed and taxed heavily already. We are in trouble because of our overspeculating and overspending. The recent government spending spree is money I have not earned yet that needs to go towards debt I have not paid back yet. Stop spending my money so I may be responsible and someday successful. I work too hard to fail b/c of inability to pay high taxes.
Banks have gotten bailed out for irresponsible lending practices and how have they treated their credit card customers? Anyone upset with their credit card bills lately? I thought Obama promised tax cuts? Where is the help for the middle class? Don't impose an income tax on us. Change your spending practices just like the responsible working class America is learning to do.
- Roscoe, Manchester
Just let the bankers take the money out of all our pockets with their Wall Street ponzi scheme. $750 billion to buy their help with fixing the devastation they caused - it's just the beginning. Why should citizens have to pay anything? Bring back the Republicanics so that we can put it all on our kid's credit cards. Roust those foolish Democrats. Who ever heard of having to pay for what you get. Complete nonsense.
- Robert, Deerfield
Why do the State Democrats continually outraise the State GOP with events like their Jefferson Jackson (not Davis or Scoop I imagine) while the GOP could do something equally enterprising?
- Mike, Goffstown
Some lawmakers feel it's OK for the state to reach into your pockets and rip your money away from you BUT, it's not OK for you and people from other states to take the money VOLUNTARILY out of your own pocket and put it into a slot machine that collects taxes. I can only deduce that some lawmakers are Sadists whose only mission is to inflict pain on you the taxpayer.
- Greg Barrett, Manchester
I think many of you are forgetting something very important. These legislators are a great deal smarter than you. Many of them went to Ivy league schools, and spend a great deal of their time around people who are also a very much more intellectually capable than you, and those who you deal with on a regular basis. So while you and your family and friends discuss amongst yourselves what is good for you, the fact is, these intellectual-legislators actually know what is best for you.
Fret not however, because soon enough, under these legislative luminaries, we'll have the utopia that places like Venezuela and Cuba are now enjoying!
- Craig D, Manchester
Josh in manch- you got that right.
An income tax didn't work in CT and it won't work here.
Why is it so hard for the gov. to understand to work within our budgets? We have to do this everyday.
The income tax only gave CT more problems. That state is now more taxed than Mass.
Make government smaller and make them repsonsible for their actions.
There is no reason that the head of any government agency should be making more than $70k a year! They get more perks than in the private sector and that should make up for the pay cut. How many people out there in the private sector have MLK day off with pay? Another foolish "holiday" that we don't need to recognize with a paid day off.
- Luke, Bristol
This state already has an income tax. Just look at the recently passed Lottery Winnings Income Tax. It is 10% and the person that just hit the Tri State in Keene foe 1.5 Million will be giving the state of NH $150,000.
As for a return to fiscal responsibility there has never been one. When the times were good the Republicans just dipped into different funds to cross fund other departments. Just look at the Highway fund where only about 40% of the money now goes to the roads and the rest is siphoned off to support anything that is on or near a road. Remember back when it was projected that the widening of I-93 would only be 78 million but when the price increased the Republicans just said "Build it and worry about the funding latter"
Both sides of the aisle have equal blame.
- Don Armstrong, Henniker
Leo asks “what's more revolting than a Democrat playing with your money“?
The answer is the republicans spending all my money and blaming it on the democrats.
From Ronald Reagan, when our total national debt was only $1 trillion through George “read my lips” Bush, to “W” Bush the deficit has grown to over $11 trillion and Obama inherited at least another trillion of debt to try to stave of another depression plus two war fronts and millions of home owners going through bankruptcy. It seems Reagan`s star wars was more important than healthcare for the people of America. It seems giving blanket military coverage to Europe, South Korea, and Japan is more important than healthcare for Americans. That sir, is more revolting
- Richard Elliott, Claremont
Puerto Rico, which doesn't pay federal taxes but has a local tax system in place that usually has the same rates, shot past us last year by adding a national sales tax. The excuse was a "bondholder crisis." Excuse-making successfully evaded the fact that, if they had followed the road map, they wouldn't have reached the cliff in the first place. "There isn't any," like steak at a steak restaurant, is a final excuse in Latin America, and the customer gets blank stares when he asks WHY there isn't any.
We should be on guard for excuse-making by our own legislature. The "inevitability" of a large new state tax will cover up the fact that no one ever rethought the proper role of state government in order to fit it to available revenue, a process Governor Lynch once promised to lead.
- Spike, Brentwood NH
I seem to remember King Lynch telling everyone that he would veto the gay marriage bill when it came across his desk as well! Im just saying...
- Adam, Salem NH
Tax "reform" like health care "reform"? Right. The point that scares me is that the Democrats were trying to do this under the radar and not let anyone know about what they were doing until it was too late - just like their platform of the last election when they ran on "I'm not Bush" and then started shoving all kinds socialistic programs and new taxes and fees down our throats so they could fulfill their spending frenzy and support their liberal buddies in Congress. It’s time they were called to stand under the full light of public scrutiny – however, given their reticence to even engage in public meetings with their constituents without a bunch of paid union bodyguards to protect them, I doubt we have a chance.
- sandy, thornton
It's only a matter of time before an income tax happens, especially if the current legislators continue in office! It's sad that NH's frugality that was once an envy of the United States no longer rings true.
- Mike, Epping
No more property taxes of any type. Then you can put in a income tax. People are paying $100+ a week in property tax in this state. In this economy, it will be easy to lose your home with this kind of tax burden. Changing the way we are taxed is the way to go. Not adding more taxes!
- Steve, Raymond
The state doesn't need an income tax or a tent tax or a name your favorite tax here. What it needs is a return to fiscal responsibility. Unfortunately, the Democrats have failed to deliver on that front. I went through the current budget and found millions that can easily be cut. 10 million for renewable energy for example. That's nothing more than feel good spending. We can't afford it.
While everyone has their pet projects that they want to protect, it's important to look at the overall needs of the state and not individual agendas. This is the tax payers money, not the legislatures. Sometimes they seem to forget where their responsibility lies. The debacle with the JUA money is a stark reminder of the lack of responsibility on display.
- Todd, Atkinson
Can we all agree that tax "reform" is an oxymoron? The Dems have no intention of removing a flaw in the current tax system, such as the insane Real Estate tax. They have every intention of buying still more power for themselves with our money. Tax "revolution" is more appropriate. After all, what's more revolting than a Democrat playing with your money?
- Leo, Canterbury
STOP SPENDING MY DAMN MONEY and maybe you won't need any new freakin taxes!!!!!!
- josh, manchester
I am not in favor of aqn income tax BUT the state has done all sorts of creative bookeeping through the years, that if a private business did it the owner would be in jail. The income tax would force some of our ultra-wealthy people pay a fgair share. There is a reason in a state will so many low paying job at the figure is fudged to show positiive funds. A sales tax hits everyone the poverty level as well as the gotbucks. Anything is better than the maqssive property taxes and huge license fees.---action is neded,
- Albert, northwood
Anyone who supports an income tax to take money out of the pockets of hard working families in this economy is signing their own political death warrant. So, bring it on out of touch Democrats.
- Jim, Manchester
NOTE: If you have visited this page before, newer comments may be hidden. Press F5, or hold down the Ctrl key while reloading or refreshing the page. (Another option for Firefox users is the Clear Cache add-on.)