SENATE BILL 553 would require public funds from localities be invested in New Hampshire banks, where the N.H. Bankers Association — the lobbying arm for the banks — argues that (according to a study it commissioned) the money would better serve the state’s economy by investing it with them, versus through investment with its competitor, the New Hampshire Public Deposit Investment Pool (the “Pool”).
The assumptions behind this bill are speculative at best and will likely result in dismantling the Pool, harming public entities and local taxpayers.
The Pool was wisely created more than 30 years ago by our Legislature after the state’s five largest banks failed and the FDIC became the single largest property owner in New Hampshire. Today, pursuant to RSA 6:45-47, the Pool is operated by the state treasurer with the assistance of an advisory committee.
The Pool offers public entities, including but not limited to municipalities, counties, school districts, trustees of trust funds, commissions, agencies, and the state itself an option for investing public funds in a program that focuses on safety, liquidity, and a competitive return. The Pool is rated AAAm by Standard and Poor’s Ratings Services, indicating excellent safety of investment principal and a superior capacity to maintain a $1.00 per share net asset value.
The Pool serves as a voluntary, state-managed investment option, separate and distinct from banks. Each public entity can pool its excess reserves with those of other government entities in an operation much like a money market mutual fund, but with the added benefit of being structured to meet the unique needs of government investors.
Although all funds are pooled for investment purposes, each entity’s participation in the pool is reported separately and each earns the same rate of return, regardless of population size or dollars invested.
The banks claim funds in the Pool are not safe because they are not insured or collateralized. This is misleading. Monies within the Pool are invested directly in securities held in the name of the Pool and permitted by the investment policy. There’s no requirement to collateralize simply because of the direct nature of the investments. A purchase of securities issued by the United States, federal agencies, commercial paper, etc., differs from bank deposits or repurchase agreements in that the Pool owns the security itself. Collateralization of bank deposits or repurchase agreements at banks are required because of the uncertainty regarding bank or counterparty failures.
The investment types purchased by the Pool are not without risk, but the same can be said for the securities banks post as collateral on deposits or for their own accounts.
The banks contend SB 553 would open up $182 million in additional business lending in New Hampshire, primarily benefiting small businesses with 50 employees or fewer. But there are no requirements in the bill for the banks to actually loan these public deposits in the state. Furthermore, the three largest banks that operate in the state, holding 55% of all public deposits, are national banks (TD Bank, Citizens Bank, and Bank of America). And the group of New Hampshire-chartered banks already have excess reserves that they could lend, according to FDIC data. In some cases, this excess cash is invested at the Federal Reserve, making additional interest for the banks and their shareholders, not public entities and indirectly local taxpayers.
The Pool’s operating model is to accept a public entity’s deposit when presented and pay it back the day requested at the published interest rate, which is the same for all investors. Conversely, banks do not have to pay the same interest rate to each depositor and may use how long funds remain deposited to determine a rate and even whether to take the deposit at all.
According to the Public Funds Investment Institute, the restrictions that SB 553 would place on the Pool would make it unlikely that the Pool would continue to operate. That would result in fewer competitive options for New Hampshire’s public entities exercising their fiduciary responsibility on behalf of taxpayers to maximize investment interest while also ensuring safety of principal.
The Pool opened 226 new accounts in the 2023 fiscal year, indicating significant interest in the Pool. Due to the Pool’s success, New Hampshire banks have had the Pool and the $680 million in public funds invested there in their sights for a few years.
The Pool has operated for more than 30 years without losing a penny of public money. We should preserve the status quo and allow the Pool to continue serving public entities as a viable alternative investment option to the banks. If banks want to win back business, all they need to do is increase interest rates and terms to match the Pool. That’s competition, which is good for the Granite State.
Todd Selig is the longtime town manager in Durham, where he lives.
NEW HAMPSHIRE has a historic opportunity to expand access to affordable, reliable, high-speed internet to everyone in the state, no matter where they live or their circumstances.
IN AN op-ed April 16th, state Rep. Len Turcotte (R-Barrington) compared two land-use bills in the state legislature to Chairman Mao’s Great Leap Forward of collectivist central planning in China.
IT’S SUPPORTED by nearly three-fourths of Granite Staters. It’s supported by politicians from all parties. Governor Chris Sununu has said repeatedly that it is something he would sign into law.
THE GRANITE STATE is experiencing a real housing crisis. For too many, affordable housing is not available or accessible in their communities, making it hard to attract and retain a talented workforce. One way we make housing more affordable for families is by modernizing our building codes …
ON FEBRUARY 8, 2024, a bill (SB 439) co-sponsored by a bipartisan group of 18 New Hampshire senators was approved by a voice vote in the state Senate. The bill, which would codify a 2023 executive action by Gov. Chris Sununu, prohibits our state from contracting with or investing in any comp…
I EXPECT I would have voted for Herbert Hoover, but Franklin Delano Roosevelt certainly knew when patriotism trumped partisanship. As England was being pounded in the Blitz by the Luftwaffe, the president recalled defeatist Ambassador Joseph Kennedy (JFK’s father) from the Court of Saint Jam…
FOLLOWING the death of former governor Walter R. Peterson in 2011, an article appeared in NH Business Review reminding readers that as “the Republican Party moved to the right, Peterson often chose to endorse Democrats, including Democratic Governor John Lynch.” The current governor has chos…
I AM deeply proud to have had the honor of serving our nation in Iraq as an officer in the Marines, where I saw firsthand the sacrifices made by military families across our nation. More than 10 years later, as a senior Pentagon official in the Obama administration, I was grateful to be a pa…
AFTER READING Kayla Montgomery’s misleading op-ed about Kelly Ayotte‘s record on IVF, abortion, and women’s health, I felt compelled to respond and provide some additional information for voters to consider.